Futuredaze/Kickstarter Update #4

Is it cheating as a blogger to copy & paste our last Kickstarter update here? Maybe…and yet I’m going to do it because there is some good information there that I think our blog readers will enjoy.

Update #4: Futuredaze is Halfway There!

Posted about 16 hours ago

Thank you for supporting science fiction for young adults! Projects like Futuredaze would not exist without help from people like you.

One of the most surprising things about doing a Kickstarter project is the number of generous and philanthropically minded people who choose to back projects like Futuredaze: An Athology of YA Science Fiction. Over the last few weeks, I’ve also seen many other important projects come to Kickstarter such as the Feminist Speculative Fiction AnthologyCrossed Genres Publications, and the Amanda Palmer Record/Book/Tour as well as other interesting projects. At a time when we are seeing funding for the arts get cut regularly, it is incredibly inspiring to see so many people come forward in support of projects like these. Again, thank you for being aFuturedaze supporter.

With 32 days to go, we are nearly at our halfway point, and things are looking good for reaching our Kickstarter goal of $1,700. We’ve lined up our printer, we’ve got our artist, and we’re in the process of securing our copyeditor and other key staff. While all of this is great, the most exciting thing is that we have received over 120 submissions after being open only 3 weeks. (On a side note, last Friday, I was literally brought to tears by one of the stories I read. Yes, I’m sure we’ll be accepting that one!)

The absolute best thing about publishing Futuredaze is the incredible outpouring of support from people who are excited to see a new young adult science fiction anthology hit the market. We’ve seen our submission guidelines/announcement appear on SF Signal, included in the YALITCHAT newsletter, posted on writers’ blogs (Bibliophile Stalker) and YA reviewer blogs (Eve’s Fan Garden), listed on electronic bulletin boards for various writers groups (Hatrack River), and emailed around to friends. Futuredaze is really starting to feel like a grassroots movement–and it’s exciting!

A large percentage of our submissions also include personal notes, thanking us for supporting science fiction for young adults. One submission included the following message, which I loved:

“The kids who buy and read this anthology will likely go to space on private space lines, and work for a corporation rather than NASA. Since I have two daughters, ages ten and seven, I have some exposure to YA literature. What I found is that a lot of YA literature is fantasy-oriented, which is fine.  But I grew up reading Robert Heinlein, Isaac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke, Ben Bova, Hal Clement, Theodore Sturgeon and other masters of science fiction.  I got hooked on it because I was actually learning about science, and knew more than my classmates.  I hope that the kids who pick up your anthology get the same feeling.”

I would love to have Futuredaze inspire young adults to keep reading science fiction, to work toward actually going into space/discovering new scientific advances, or to find a way to apply what they’re reading here to their personal learning experiences in the classroom. However, in order for that to happen we need to reach our Kickstarter goal and to continue receiving top notch young adult science fiction and poetry.

Thanks again for everything you have already done. If you know anyone who might like to support YA science fiction or who writes YA science fiction, please free to spread the word!

Posted in Futuredaze, Science Fiction, Signal Boost, Uncategorized, Young Adult Literature | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Why SF?: An Interview with Melinda Snodgrass, SF Novelist and Screenwriter

Underwords’ first Why SF? interview is with the extremely talented science fiction novelist and screenwriter Melinda Snodgrass.

I first met Melinda several years ago at Boskone, Boston’s local science fiction convention, where she was giving a presentation on writing for television. I was immediately impressed by her knowledge of the writing craft, but it was her love of science fiction that really shined through.

When it came time to approach potential interviewees  for Why SF?, Melinda was one of the first people I wanted to include because of her wide breath of experience with the science fiction genre–both in print and in film.  Not only is Melinda a true inspiration for science fiction fans, she’s also one of the nicest people you’re likely to meet. It was an honor to include her in the Why SF? and to interview her about her work, her views on science fiction, and her inspirations.

I hope you enjoy Underwords’ first installment of Why SF?

~

What it is about science fiction that you love or that inspires you most to write?

The optimism. The sense that there is a galaxy out there waiting for us to come and explore. I also want to write about characters who are finding their inner reserves. Who don’t think they can rise to the challenge, but somehow find the strength.

Science fiction is a large part of your writing life. What or who were some of the most important SF influences as a reader or as a writer?

A lot of early Heinlein — Have Spacesuit Will Travel, Citizen of Galaxy, Moon is a Harsh Mistress. Poul Anderson, Andre Norton, Zelazny. I never tried to write like any of them, but I tried to figure out why their stories were so compelling.

What kind of challenges, if any, have you faced as a female science fiction novelist and/or television writer? How did you overcome those challenges?

I didn’t see much affect on my prose writing career from being a woman. It is more common in Hollywood where you get pushed toward shows with more “female” themes which was not a good fit for me because I was and am known as “that chick who writes action.” I think the best way to overcome these stereotypes is to write scripts that can’t be ignored or pigeon holes.

As a science fiction writer living in an age that would have once been considered a “science fictional” world, where do you like to see SF literature go from here?

I’d like to see more space based science fiction like Heaven’s Shadow or Leviathan Wakes. I enjoy space opera, and I want stories that take me to the stars, not stories that tell me how shitty things are going to be on Earth. I prefer optimistic science fiction over dystopias.

How would you describe The Edge series for readers who are unfamiliar with your current SF novels?

The Edge books are the story about an eons long struggle between the forces of science and rationality on one side, and superstition, magic and religion on the other. I come down on the side of science.

What have you enjoyed most about working on The Edge series?

Experiencing my main character as he finds that inner strength, and comes to accept who and what he is. It’s also fun to get take on the toxic mix of politics and religion that now corrupts our political system. The rise of the religious right, and the Republican’s party rejection of rationality is one of the reasons I wrote these books.

You and George R. R. Martin created the Wild Card novels together, what is it about that series that has kept it going all of these years over a span of nearly 20 books?

The characters and their interactions. People don’t read prose superheroes for the big fight sequences–they are more effective in a comic or on the screen, but what Wild Cards has done is told very real stories about the human heart in conflict with itself.

On the advice of a friend to try your craft in Hollywood, you wrote a spec script for Star Trek: The Next Generation. Why Star Trek? What was it about that series that made you take a chance on a spec script?

It was George R.R. who encouraged me try my hand at screenwriting. He thought I would be good at it since my strength is plotting, strong characters, and good dialog. He said if I wrote a spec he would show it to his agent. I looked at the various shows–L.A. Law, I felt it was too intricately plotted for me to write an effective script. Beauty and the Beast–I couldn’t do that, George was on the show, and what if I wrote a crappy script? That would really have put him on the spot.

I grew up as a kid on original Trek and loved it so I picked Next Generation. I watched a number of episodes, decided Data was the most interesting character (which is pretty ironic since he’s a robot), and wrote the script.

Your Star Trek: The Next Generation episode “Measure of a Man”, your spec script, is often regarded as one of the best episodes of the series. What was the inspiration behind that episode? How much of yourself did you put into that story?

I couldn’t have written “Measure” without my law school training. It’s basically the Dred Scott decision updated and applied to Data rather than an escaped slave. I had a friend who was a navy officer who said that when you can’t have a formal JAG hearing the captain of a ship always defends and the first officer prosecutes. That put Picard and Riker in direct conflict with Data’s life at stake. That’s pure drama.

Currently, there are only a few original science fiction television series still airing on TV. For instance, Doctor Who and Alphas seem to have survived the most recent spate of cancellations so far this season compared to only a few years ago when multiple shows were being aired, renewed, and created. What do you think is missing from SF television today?

There’s a ton of science fiction on television. Basically we won. Movies and TV are all SF and fantasy. Grimm, Once Upon a Time, Game of Thrones, Alphas, Dr. Who, Awake, Terra Nova, Falling Skies, etc. etc. Granted some of them have been canceled, but they deserved to be–they weren’t good shows.

I wish they’d do another big space show, but they’re expensive, and you need to have the right mix of characters.

What would you like to see more of from the science fiction genre–either in print, film or television?

More space, more distant worlds, more adventure.

What are you working on now? Any new projects, novels, or stories that will be out soon?

I have the first book in a new urban fantasy series set in a vampire law firm that will be coming out in September called THIS CASE IS GONNA KILL ME. I’ve written it under the name Phillipa Bornikova so there won’t be confusion since it’s a very different genre.

  • I’m writing an Old Mars story for George R.R. Martin and Gardner Dozois.
  • I’m writing for and editing the next Wild Card book LOWBALL.
  • I’m writing on the third Edge novel.
  • And I’m outlining and getting ready to write the Wild Card movie for Universal’s SyFy Films division.

I’m kind of busy, but it’s fun.

~

Melinda Snodgrass – After eight years as a novelist which included the publication of her CIRCUIT trilogy, and co-creating, editing, and writing for the Wild Card series, Melinda began her career as a story editor on STAR TREK:TNG, and wrote the Writer’s Guild Award nominated script THE MEASURE OF A MAN. She worked for REASONABLE DOUBTS, and PROFILER, wrote six pilots, and had one produced and aired, STAR COMMAND. She is currently working on the third book in the EDGE series, has delivered the first book in a new urban fantasy series, and is starting on the second.  She has two screenplays currently under consideration in Hollywood. Visit her online at http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/

Posted in Interviews, Science Fiction, Uncategorized, Why SF? | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Introducing Why SF?: Underwords’ New Interview Series

I am pleased to announce that Underwords will be doing a new interview series called Why SF? This series will explore how science fiction has affected the lives of a variety of creative and influential people. Interviewees will range from writers, to inventors, to perhaps even a NASA astronaut. The combination of imagination and science in fiction is a powerful gift, and I am thrilled to present the Why SF? series to you through Underwords.

When I first came up with the idea for the Why SF? interview series, I was excited about  the potential interviewees who might participate. As I sat down to develop the questions for my interviewees, questions that they could really dig into, it became clear that Why SF? needed an introduction from me to clarify some of the concepts behind the series. Why is science fiction so important to me? Why is science fiction something that I feel needs to be shared and promoted among readers–both young and old? The answers to these questions touched on personal life issues that I wasn’t sure I was ready to talk about publicly. However, I also realized that I can’t possibly hope to interview anyone, asking them “Why SF?”, if I wasn’t willing to talk about my own experiences.

A year and a half ago my mother died. After almost three decades of fighting cancer, the disease finally invaded her bones, various other parts of her body, and her brain. While the cancer was slow moving and medicine fended it off for a long time, it was still debilitating. My mother was a LVN nurse in a convalescent hospital, and she spent most of her adult life making the lives of others more bearable during their last years, months, and days in this world–all the while she was battling for her own life. I believe that to some extent the scientists, researchers, and doctors who developed the cancer treatments taken by my mom had to be influenced in some way by science fiction, by imagining new ways to convert the impossible to possible, and by the dreamers whose minds were turned “on” by science that was made fun and interesting. After all, science and science fiction often go hand-in-hand.

When I was in fifth grade, the mother of one of my classmates started a book club for the people in her daughter’s class. Being a latchkey kid with nothing better to do, I joined not really knowing what to expect. I was introduced to classics such as The Yearling, Where the Red Fern Grows, Watership Down, Anne of Green Gables, and The Black Cauldron. While I enjoyed all of these books, it was Lloyd Alexander’s book The Black Cauldron that sparked a sustaining reading interest for me. We didn’t have much money at the time, which meant that once the book club ended so did my supply of books. While the school library did a decent job of satisfying my new reading appetite for a while, it couldn’t keep up with the newest publications that were hitting the bookstore shelves. Meanwhile my mom was a single parent, working three jobs, raising two daughters, and starting her battle with cancer. There wasn’t money in the budget for books. So, I went out collecting bottles and cans to trade in at the local supermarket for cash to buy my books. With just enough money for a new book and a bag of gummy coke bottles, I struck off for the bookstore to find that they had mixed the fantasy with something called science fiction.

I must have pulled out every book from Asimov to Zelazny, scrutinizing the covers and reading the blurbs. I had come for fantasy, and I left with science fiction. After reading dozens of books by authors like Bradbury, de Vinge, and Le Guin, I understood that the reading about “the possible” and “the probable” was just as fascinating as reading about the fantastic.

By the time I was fifteen, I was knee deep in science fiction, fantasy, and horror. Sadly, by that time, I was also hit with the reality of my mom’s disease. It seemed like a thousand people must have asked me if I was okay. I wasn’t okay, but I told them I was so that they wouldn’t worry. They smiled, happy to have done their job of checking on me and then they each went about their own business. I was not okay. I was scared. I was sad. I was depressed. My father had abandoned me and now I was in danger of also losing my mother. There was no part of me that was okay. While the people who checked on me left, my books stayed with me–each of them gaining a special spot on my bookshelves and in my heart.

My mom continued working multiple jobs. It bothered her than I had to come home to an empty house, but what she didn’t understand was that I came home to my books. Through reading, I found solace and strength that I couldn’t find in the real world. I learned about honor, integrity, work ethics, criminals, war, poverty, desperation, triumph and so much more. I found kindred spirits in the children and adults in the novels I read, and they stuck with me, guiding me through the difficult times until I was able to make it on my own.

The truth is that fantasy, science fiction, and horror are all important to me in different ways. These genres helped me to become a better person. They taught me how to dream. They helped me to find my path and, in so doing, they saved me from depression that threatened to remove me from the world. Fantasy helped me to imagine, horror helped me to overcome my fear, but it was science fiction that helped me to imagine my future. That is Why SF is so important to me.

When I look around bookstores today, I see a lot of fantasy and horror, but I don’t see nearly as many science fiction novels–especially science fiction anthologies for young adults. Why am I so passionate about science fiction for young adults? Although I’d like to think I’m special and that my experience with science fiction was unique, I know that’s not true. Science fiction has inspired generations of children and adults who have worked together over time to build our world, which could easily have been a science fictional location in any of the stories written by the pioneers of this incredible genre.

I could never have imagined my future days when I was a young adult, if it weren’t for the writers who shared their imaginations of tomorrow with me. This is why I love science fiction, this is why I am a strong supporter of young adult fiction, and this is why I am taking Underwords independent in order to publish the best YA science fiction anthology that my co-editor Hannah Strom-Martin and I can create. We’re going after the best fiction we can find in order to make Futuredaze a reality. This is my answer to Why SF? What’s yours?

~

Underwords is also excited to announce that our Kickstarter project to help fund the production of Futuredaze is going strong. However, we could use your help to reach our goal of $1,700. Every dollar counts since we don’t collect anything if we don’t reach our goal.

We truly appreciate anything that you can do to help — whether you pre-order a copy of Futuredaze, back us for a higher amount, or just spread the word to others who might like to help support science fiction for young adults. You can click here to back Futuredaze on Kickstarter now! Thank you for your support.

Posted in Futuredaze, Science Fiction, Signal Boost, Uncategorized, Why SF?, Young Adult Literature | Tagged , | 3 Comments

An Interview with Dark Fiction Writer & Editor Tracy L. Carbone

I’ve said this before, and I can guarantee you that I’ll be saying it again, but one of the best things about having a literary blog is that you get to talk to some of the most amazing people. Interviewing Tracy L. Carbone is no exception.

Tracy is not only a fantastic dark fiction writer, but she’s also a member of the New England Horror Writers (NEHW) and the editor of Epitaphs–the NEHW’s first anthology. It was a pleasure to interview Tracy for Underwords, and she has quite a lot to share. We hope you enjoy the interview and that you check out Epitaphs, which has received a lot of positive critical attention.

~

How long have you been writing and/or editing? 

I’ve been writing my whole life but only started getting published about six years ago. Since then I’ve been selling stories pretty regularly and recently sold my first novel. Epitaphs was the first anthology I’ve edited.

Who are some of the writing icons or role models who have most influenced your own work?

I love F. Scott Fitzgerald, Wally Lamb and Ray Bradbury. I confess I’ve also read a bunch of Danielle Steele, Jodi Picoult and Meg Cabot. I’m a fan of Oprah books as well, all the “girl” books and classics like Secret Life of Bees. I don’t think there was an one influence but many very good writers who encouraged me.

You’re primarily a dark fiction and horror writer. What is it about this genre that inspires you? What other genres have you explored?

I’ve dabbled in mainstream and literary but even that always has a dark side. I’ve got some stories that are mainstream tearjerkers. Witnessing human frailty and weakness inspires me to write about it and that results in dark fiction. On some level, I suppose I want to write away the real life darkness to justify how people and situations can be so unfortunate.

Can you tell us a little about the New England Horror Writers (NEHW)? Are there other regional associations for horror writers?

NEHW started off many years ago as a regional branch of the Horror Writers Association. We were HWA NE. They have regional groups all over the country available on their website. A couple of years ago, the HWA became more stringent with their requirements of branch members so we elected to step away and become autonomous. Many of the NEHW members are still HWA, including me, but our group is more informal.

For readers unfamiliar with Epitaphs, how would you describe the anthology?

The only theme we assigned to the anthology when we were setting forth submissions was that it be dark and that it be “damn good writing.” We have an array or straight classic horror, comedy, mysteries and everything in between.

What inspired the idea to create Epitaphs?

The NEHW hs been batting around the idea of an anthology for several years. But we’d alwayss come up with a huge list of why we couldn’t pull it off. March of 2011 we’d recently changed over most of the Board and all met for our quarterly meeting. The topic of an anthology came up again, as it always did, but this time, with the new energy we finally decided we’d just do it, and it would work. We decided not to accept defeat. We gave ourselves a tight deadline, to have it in print in less than 8 months for a debut at AnthoCon. Working hard as a team and with some wonderful submissions we were able to get it done and get a Stoker Nomination.

Was this your first editing experience? Was there anything about the process that you wish you knew before you started the process?

This was my first editing experience. If I had it to do over, I would have had the stories stripped of names so I didn’t know whose I was reading. I picked the very best stories but there were some hurt feelings and resentment.

What has been the most rewarding part of the Epitaphs experience?

Renewing my love of short story reading and writing, and giving some great writers a spot were the best parts of the project. I was impressed by the submissions, and the quality of stories inspired me to start writing more.

It is said that learning to write well is like experiencing a series of never ending writing related epiphanies. If you had to pick one, what is the most important lesson you have learned, so far?

There have been a bunch but here are a few: write everything down. You think you’ll remember it later but you won’t. Also, if you think you’ve written the best thing ever, STOP, put it down and reread it at least a day or two later. If it’s still great, then send it out. Most times, you’ll find typos or inconsistencies that were missed because you were so excited to write the story. Finally, no matter how much you hate someone, don’t submit whatever vengeful fiction you’ve written about them until you calm down. And when you calm down, if you still hate them, cloak the characters more. Then by all means, send it out. It’ll make you feel better. And it will have lots of passion.

For readers looking for more Tracy Carbone fiction, what new projects are you working on? Where can they find you?

My middle grade mystery The Soul Collector is available on Amazon. I have several short stories on the Kindle as well. In the coming months I will be working with a new publisher and will release a collection of dark stories including many never seen before, as well as a women’s thriller novel.

Updates and information on my books can be found on my website www.tracylcarbone.com.

Posted in Books and Literature, Horror, Interviews, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Kickstarting Futuredaze

We’ve set up a Kickstarter project to help raise funds for Futuredaze and to also give people a way to preorder a copy now. Our Kickstarter project is only active until June 25th.

If we don’t hit our goal, we don’t collect any of the contributions offered. We could really use your help. Even if you don’t preorder a book or contribute financially to the project, it would be great if you could help spread the word to people who might be interested in supporting and promoting science fiction within the YA community.

For me, there are few things more exciting than inspiring young, creative minds to read and envision not only the possible but the probable.

Visit Futuredaze’s Kickstarter page.

Writers, check out the submission guidelines.

Thank you for your support!

Posted in Make a Difference, Poetry, Publications, Science Fiction, Uncategorized, Young Adult Literature | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Announcing: Futuredaze – An Anthology of YA Science Fiction

UNDERWORDS is happy to announce that we will begin accepting submissions for our new anthology Futuredaze: An Anthology of YA Science Fiction, edited by Hannah Strom-Martin and Erin Underwood, which will be published in June 2013. Submissions for the anthology will open on May 1, 2012 and will close when filled.

Futuredaze will feature fiction and poetry that sparks the imagination, twists the heart, and makes us yearn for the possibilities of a world yet to come. At a time when every other YA book features vampires, werewolves or other fantastical creatures (which we love!), Futuredaze will be an anthology for the next generation of science fiction readers. We’re looking for hard science fiction, soft science fiction, and everything in between. Think Jules Verne, Isaac Asimov, George Orwell or Ray Bradbury with a YA focus.

You can find the submission guidelines under the Publications link above or you can access them directly by clicking here.

Posted in Books and Literature, Futuredaze, Publications, Science Fiction, Signal Boost, Young Adult Literature | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Review & Contest: Best Horror of the Year Vol 4, edited by Ellen Datlow

Title: The Best Horror of the Year Volume 4
Edited by: Ellen Datlow
Publisher: Night Shade Books
ISBN: 978-1597803991

You will be swept away by the sheer relentlessness of The Best Horror or the Year, Volume Four, edited by Ellen Datlow.

The Best Horror of the Year, Volume 4, contains an excellent selection of stories that rise to the top of the genre. Some of the pieces include topics that are shocking and at times difficult to read while others leave scenes lingering in your mind long after you’ve reached the end. As with any anthology, readers are sure to find they like some stories more than others, but the quality and diversity of the pieces within this anthology are spot on.

There is no story within The Best Horror of the Year, Volume 4 that doesn’t belong. Of course, the pieces by Stephen King and Peter Straub deliver as expected. While Straub’s piece is more challenging, King’s will tap into your sympathy and leave you wondering “then what happened?” Other notable stories include “The Moraine” by  Simon Bestwick, which is infused with the tangible influence of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and Priya Sharma’s story “The Show,” which puts the reality into reality TV. Then there is John Langan who, in gymnastics terms, sticks the ending of his stories every time.

Special thanks to all of the authors who were able to participate in the group interview for The Best Horror of the Year, Volume 4. Below, they share their thoughts on the horror genre as well as some fascinating background on what inspired the stories within this collection. We hope you enjoy the interview and that you’ll also enter the contest to win 1 of 5 copies of The Best Horror of the Year, Volume 4, which have been provided by Night Shade Books.

What is it about dark fiction or horror that captures your imagination as a writer or a reader?

Anna Taborska: The world is a cruel and terrifying place, and, if art is supposed to hold a mirror up to nature, then horror is the art form that does it best.

Livia Llewellyn: For  me, experiencing horror (as both reader and writer) is the chance to open an emotional gate inside me that usually remains closed, unchallenged, and unused in my day-to-day life. I don’t approach horror and horrific events as an end, but as doorways into greater understanding of myself, in imagining what kind of person I and my characters would become in the worst times and under the worst experiences. Horror is a crucible that brings about transformation not just in the physical world, but also in those who experience it.

Leah Bobet: That it’s a kind of literature that’s always trying to find out who we, as people, are.  Dark fiction and horror fiction are in some senses, really very introspective: What are our best and worst impulses, and where did they come from?  What would we do in the worst kinds of situations; how do we really act under pressure, or removed from social rules, or in the face of something we don’t understand?  What’s the measure of us?  Who are we, really?

Which is of course a fascinating question, and one of the most worthwhile to be asking, I think.  And it’s the question that leads to another of the most worthwhile questions: So, how can we be more, be better?

Margo Lanagan: I’m pretty much against niceness and soothingness in my reading, although characters I can love as they tackle their inner and outer monsters, I’m grateful to an author for those. I like a story to shake me up and to bend my view of the world, to make me wonder how much I could really deal with, in terms of the grim, the violent and the unfortunate. I wouldn’t say I’m actually much of a horror reader, but definitely I like to see characters tested by encounters with systems or phenomena that threaten or frighten them.

A.C. Wise: I’ve always been drawn to dark fiction and horror. There’s something appealing about the idea of exploring the monstrous – whether in human form or otherwise – from a safe distance. As a reader, you can always walk away. As an author, you can usually control the outcome. Horror fiction allows us to explore the darkness, but with an escape route close at hand. Horror fiction also appeals to the part of me that wants the world to be wild and strange. The themes and tropes of horror and dark fiction seem to brush up against the every day world more frequently than, say, fantasy; they seem a little more plausible. Very few people out there will tell you with absolute conviction about the time they saw a unicorn, but almost everyone knows somebody with a personal ghost story.

John Langan:  For me, the attraction of horror lies in its unique ability to represent the experience of profound personal and even social dislocation–which is to say, those moments in our lives when the bottom falls out of everything.  Horror is able to give form to that catastrophe and shape to the story of our reaction(s) to it.  There are also monsters.

Laid Barron: You know, I keep asking myself the same question. Upon consideration, I think it just boils down to the fact that I’m a dark, moody, perverse SOB.

Alison Littlewood: I didn’t make a deliberate choice to write dark fiction – it just grabbed hold of me and wouldn’t let go. I think it’s just how I’m wired. I suppose I’m fascinated with things that we can’t quite explain or reconcile ourselves to. And it’s the most fun you can have with a pen! I didn’t grow up reading much horror either, though I used to borrow Stephen King novels from my brother. Since I discovered I enjoy writing dark fiction, it’s really changed by reading habits too.

Brian Hodge: There are a lot of factors, with a couple of big things that go hand-in-hand. First, there’s the throwing away or invalidation of the rules of everyday life, from orderly human conduct and decency, to everything we regard as consensus reality. You get to make your own rules, and break even those. So there’s a sense that anything can happen.

As well, a lot of horror takes place in the shadows, in pockets hidden behind the surfaces of normality. It’s like you’re caught out someplace at 3am, when everyone else is home asleep, and you pass this building and can’t quite suss out why that one light is on, or what’s making those sounds … you just know none of it feels right. I like that feeling of discovery, of peeling back the façade to get to the secrets. In a way, it confirms what you always suspected about the world but hoped you’d never actually find. Or maybe you hoped you would, because it makes the world a more interesting place.

Glen Hirshberg: So many things, really. I love the imagery. I love the way fear and wonder feed and augment and twist around each other. I love that eeriness, on the page, turns out to be such a terrifically effective catalyst for heightening other emotions. I love the challenge of writing this kind of fiction, because sustaining that spell is hard, and demands so much thought about the language itself. Or maybe giving yourself over to the language itself.

Simon Bestwick: It creates a setting where anything can happen.  You can have as much of the real world as you want, and as much as you like of any other; also it’s very easy to rope in elements of other genres.  Every genre gives writers a kind of toolbox to explore certain themes, certain aspects of life.  With horror, you can call on all of them.  Whatever you need is there for the taking.

You can go all the places- physically and emotionally- in a story of this kind that you’d avoid in real life.  And when it’s done well you can ask all the big question, exercise your imagination and still tell a great story.   Plus, good horror fiction requires great technical skill and precise use of language

Of course, horror tends to mean dark, but here’s no reason why you couldn’t take a similar approach that would be a bit sunnier and more cheerful in tone.  Generally if my stuff hasn’t got some dark elements in it then it feels too lightweight, but never say never.

What was the inspiration behind your story that was selected for The Best Horror of the Year Volume 4?

Chet Williamson: I was approached by a friend who’s also a small publisher, and he wondered if I had a story that I’d like to have reprinted as a chapbook with a CD of me reading the story. The more I thought about it, the more I was captured by the thought of writing something that was intended to be heard, yet something that could stand alone as well. I play guitar and was in a Celtic band for several years, and also have a deep love of American roots music, so I thought it might be fun to create something with a song attached, and thus “The Final Verse” was written. I actually recorded the story with the song and guitar accompaniment for the CD, but the publisher’s program ended due to financial difficulties, and the chapbook/CD was never released. Off the story went to The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, where Gordon Van Gelder’s editorial savvy helped make it even better. I hope to release it as an MP3 file someday so it can be heard as intended.

Laird Barron: The Willows by Algernon Blackwood. That and a love-hate relationship with the wilderness. Also, a hate-hate relationship with sports hunters.

Anna Taborska: When I was a little girl, my grandmother’s best friend, Irena, came to London to visit us. A friend of the family went to pick Irena up from Heathrow Airport. As she came out through the Arrivals Gate, she accidentally dropped her glasses and stepped on them. When our friend expressed how sorry he was that she’d broken her glasses, Irena laughed the incident off and stated that the glasses were just “a little pig”. Our friend later confessed that he thought Irena might be completely mad. My grandmother explained that she and Irena grew up in the east of Poland (which was annexed by the Soviet Union after the Second World War, and is now part of the Ukraine). Winters were very harsh, and you needed a horse-drawn sleigh to travel through the forest from one village to another in the deep snow. It was common to take a piglet along on such trips, to throw to the wolves in case of an attack on the horse. Horrible as it sounds, the notion of taking a little pig along as a potential sacrifice to avert the death of horse and people probably made sense at the time. For Irena and my grandmother, Natalia, the term ‘little pig’ became synonymous with the superstition that if a minor mishap befell someone – particularly while travelling – it was generally good sign, as it meant that a greater disaster would be avoided thanks to the small sacrifice. I think they were rather tongue-in-cheek about their superstition, but I found the idea of taking a piglet along as a potential sacrifice to wolves rather horrific. Which led me to thinking: how horrific could things get if the little pig wasn’t where it should be?

John Langan: Some time ago, my friend, Laird Barron, was telling me about a story he had completed which featured a monstrous giant, somewhat on the order of Goya’s famous painting of Saturn devouring his child.  This seemed to me such a brilliant idea that I immediately vowed to steal it.  When the invitation came from Ellen Datlow to contribute to her Supernatural Noir anthology, that image, along with its more mundane avatar, Mr. White, found its way into it.

A.C. Wise: The seeds of Final Girl Theory were planted during a cemetery tour in New Orleans. The tour guide pointed out a monument that had been featured in a scene in Easy Rider (at least I think that was the movie). It got me thinking about truth and illusion in films in general. The moment I got back to the hotel room, I started working on the story. It’s also a bit of a love letter to cult films, and slasher movies, and B movie classics, and a whole host of other influences that soaked my early years. But, of course, on the other hand, it’s nothing like that at all…

Simon Bestwick: The first story, ‘The Moraine’, started with the title.  I then had to look it up to find out what a moraine was!  (Read the story to find out.)  I knew I wanted to write a story, but wasn’t sure what to do with it.  There had to be something in the moraine, and I knew it had to be something more substantial than a ghost- it needed to be something physical, a creature of some kind.  At the same time I wanted it to be scary rather than simply bloody, so it had to build tension and suspense.  The nature of the setting helped determine that.  Then there had to be real people in the story.  Originally I thought of something with a bigger cast, but in the end it worked best if I kept it simple.  Writing it, I imagined it as a short film or a television play, which helped me focus on the couple in the story.  Making their relationship a troubled but not doomed one made them realer too and gave the story somewhere to go when there wasn’t a monster around…

‘Dermot,’ the second story, was inspired by a guy I saw on the bus a few times.  He looked pretty much the title character in the story, which made him stand out and catch my eye.  I did what I sometimes do in such cases, which was to invent an imaginary biography for him.  Not a very flattering one, I’m afraid- I pictured him as a child predator or something, but that wasn’t enough for a story.   So I gave it a bit of an extra twist, and I had this piece, which was written in a single sitting and hardly needed a word changed.

Glen Hirshberg: This one actually grew out of some real life experiences, from back when my wife and I first moved to Los Angeles right after the riots. We had this talkative, charming, nervous upstairs neighbor who used to regale us with neighborhood stories, and who moaned so loudly in her sleep that our ceiling shook. We had another neighbor, an aspiring actress, who used to sit in the little square of grass out front of our building and watch the traffic with her turtle, which she claimed was 150 years old. And we had one fist-sized spider that liked to make an enormous web right across our front door.

Margo Lanagan: I wrote ‘Mulberry Boys’ at Ellen’s request for her Blood and Other Cravings anthology. I’m not mad about vampires, but when she said that the story need only deal with vampirism in some way, that gave me the freedom to find a back entrance into that area of the genre.

The human silkworm idea? Well, we did the mulberry-leaves-in-the-box thing when our boys were little; perhaps it was the sight of those green, fragile, flightless moths that established the sweet characters of the mulberry boy in the story. And I remember a documentary I watched on silk-making, from which an image of the mass cocoon-unravelling machine made an impression, the brutality with which people harvested the fruits of all that delicate work.

Leah Bobet: “Stay” came out of a few things, but the seed was an NFB documentary I watched back in 2004 or so about a series of freezing deaths in Saskatoon–young aboriginal men found dead of cold on the outskirts of the city—and the allegation that Saskatoon police officers were picking aboriginal men up, driving them to the outskirts of the city, and leaving them there to find their own way home in sub-zero temperatures.  The documentary was about the legal fallout and commission of inquiry that followed, but mostly I was furious that this would even happen: It wasn’t only an abuse of police authority, or a vicious kind of racism; it’s a breaking of the entire social contract of a cold-weather society.  Leaving someone to freeze, deliberately giving them to the winter instead of building and helping and working against the cold, is the worst, most antisocial, most shockingly wrong thing I can imagine.  It is unspeakable.

It took about six years to find a way to make that unspeakableness into a coherent piece of fiction.  I knew why and how it was wrong.  But to write about it, I had to think, long and hard, about what would instead be right.

Brian Hodge: Poisoned nostalgia. Although I was a town kid, my father came from the kind of rural area depicted in the story. Growing up, I spent a lot of time there visiting my grandparents. I think it helped foster a kind of magical relationship with, and love of, fields and woodlands, and green and growing things in general.

As an adult, my first sense that the community was rotting from the inside was when I pulled county jury duty in a trial over a stabbing that had occurred there. As I listened to the testimony about these people’s lives, it brought on a sadness over the changes in the place as I remembered it. So that planted a seed to do a story about this dissonance, but it lay dormant a long time, and after moving away, the longer we lived in Colorado, the farther away I got from it.

Then, during a recent visit back, I learned from an uncle that the place, like so many rural communities, had deteriorated even further as meth culture moved in, and that convicted pedophiles were seeing it as a good haven to retreat after their release. That rekindled everything, and I did the story a few months later, but with clearer eyes. My uncle also told me how my great-grandparents, dirt-poor people I never knew, had their one hog stolen just before autumn butchering time, with no restitution, and it was an even harder, leaner winter for them than usual. Places like that have always had their darker sides, despite how you may have come out of childhood with a romanticized sense of some earlier purity.

Alison Littlewood: The story actually came from my obsession with fairy tales when I was a kid. It’s a rather twisted take on one of my favourites – The Wild Swans, or The Six Swans. It’s about transformations, and the character in the story – who’s a bit of a dreamer, not unlike myself at that age – wants to transform her brother. But fairy tales often contained a lot of darkness as well as light, and that was something I wanted to reflect in Black Feathers.

Livia Llewellyn: My father was a teacher and my mother’s job was raising me and my sister, so our family had every summer to take lots and lots of trips. Dad would pack up our Volkswagen camper and drive us on these two and three week-long trips to Mt. Rainier, the Olympics and Cascades, the ocean coast and San Juan Islands – pretty much everywhere in Washington State and British Columbia that was wilderness. Most of the trips were uneventful, but a few bordered on the truly horrific, when he’d get us lost somewhere in the mountains, without a single clue as to how to find civilization again. I remember him pouring over his maps looking for some road or trail that might materialize and give us a way out. Outside, my mother would be pacing the woods freaking out, and my sister and I sat in the back of the camper, wondering how long it would be until we ran out of food and died. We laugh about those trips now, but as a child it was truly traumatizing for me; and so years later, when I started to write in earnest, I always knew I’d eventually use those vacations as inspiration for a story – which turned out to be “Omphalos”.

In honor of Ellen Datlow’s work within the horror genre, I asked the interviewees to share what “Ellen Datlow is” to them, and we received some amazing responses!

Ellen Datlow

Ellen Datlow is… just plain utterly awesome.’  What else could I possibly say? :) ~ Simon Bestwick

Ellen Datlow is an inspiration. (Which is an uninspired sentence, but the statement remains true!) ~ A.C. Wise

In a world that generates bewildering numbers of stories each year, Ellen Datlow is a winnower with efficiency, style and substance, distilling the essence of each year’s darkness. ~ Margo Lanagan

Ellen Datlow is a great lady and a first class editor! ~ Anna Taborska

Ellen Datlow is awesome – among her other achievements, for the way her work encourages new writers: I remember first getting an honourable mention in her Best Of round-up and being absolutely thrilled! ~ Alison Littlewood

Ellen Datlow is not only one of the genre’s finest editors ever, but a repository of knowledge about the whole field. She seems to remember everything she reads, and her taste in choosing stories from that vast wealth of material has proven impeccable. ~ Chet Williamson

Ellen Datlow is probably one of the single greatest influences there is on the direction of genre fiction. ~ Leah Bobet

Ellen Datlow may love and understand horror fiction even more than she does cats. ~ Glen Hirshberg

Ellen Datlow is one of the greatest champions of horror and dark fiction in the world. She is our living treasure. ~ Livia Llewellyn

Ellen Datlow is one of my favorite people. The first time I met her, at the 2003 Readercon, she told me she had loved my most recent story and asked me when I was going to send her a story. Talk about being made to feel welcome. ~ John Langan

Ellen Datlow is the hardest-working woman in speculative fiction, and the best friend a cat ever had. ~ Brian Hodge

Ellen Datlow is far and away the greatest living editor of horror and dark fantasy. ~ Laird Barron

ENTER THE CONTEST
Best Horror of the Year Volume 4

Enter for your chance to win 1 of 5 copies of Best Horror of the Year Volume 4 by posting a note in the comments below by midnight on Saturday, April 28th. One entry per person.

**You can get a double entry by posting the link for this contest on your blog, Facebook page, in Twitter, or somewhere else. Then, mention in the comments below that you “boosted the signal” and your one entry counts as two entries – doubling your chances to win.**

The contest is open to anyone with a U.S. mailing address. The winner will be chosen at random and contacted via email for mailing instructions. If you are under 17, please get your parent’s permission to enter this contest.

~

Table of Contents:

  • The Little Green God of Agony – Stephen King
  • Stay – Leah Bobet
  • The Moraine – Simon Bestwick
  • Blackwood’s Baby – Laird Barron
  • Looker – David Nickle
  • The Show – Priya Sharma
  • Mulberry Boys – Margo Lanagan
  • Roots and All – Brian Hodge
  • Final Girl Theory – A. C. Wise
  • Omphalos – Livia Llewellyn
  • Dermot – Simon Bestwick
  • Black Feathers – Alison J. Littlewood
  • Final Verse – Chet Williamson
  • In the Absence of Murdock – Terry Lamely
  • You Become the Neighborhood – Glen Hirshberg
  • In Paris, In the Mouth of Kronos – John Lantern
  • Little Pig – Anna Taborska
  • The Ballad of Ballard and Sandrine – Peter Straub

~

The contest is closed and the winners are:

Andy Hardy, Frank Lewis, Brewerstt, Midnyte Reader, and C.W. LaSart

Congratulations!!!! Thank you to everyone who entered the Best Horror of the Year, Vol Four contest!!

Posted in Contest, Horror, Reviews, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 86 Comments

2012 Hugo and Campbell Awards Nominees

Underwords is boosting the signal for the 2012 Hugo and Campbell Award Nominees. If you’re unfamiliar with either of these awards, the quick description is these are the people whose science fiction or fantasy work fall into the category of best-of-the-best for 2012. If you love reading good science fiction and fantasy, you should take a look at this list of nominees and then head to the bookstore to make a few purchases, especially for any writer who may be new to you. It’s a great list of nominees and an exceptional ballot.

Good luck to all, and may the odds be ever in your favor!

Please note that the text below has been copied from Locus Online and presented here in order to “boost the signal.”

2012 Hugo and Campbell Awards Nominees

— posted Saturday 7 April 2012 @ 1:30 pm PDT by Locus Online.

Nominees for the Hugo Awards and for the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer have been announced by Chicon 7, the 70th World Science Fiction Convention, to be held in Chicago, Illinois, August 30-September 3, 2012. The Hugo Awards ceremony will take place September 2, 2012.

BEST NOVEL

BEST NOVELLA

BEST NOVELETTE

  • ‘‘Six Months, Three Days’’, Charlie Jane Anders (Tor.com 6/8/11)
  • ‘‘The Copenhagen Interpretation’’, Paul Cornell (Asimov’s 7/11)
  • ‘‘What We Found’’, Geoff Ryman (F&SF 9-10/11)
  • ‘‘Fields of Gold’’, Rachel Swirsky (Eclipse Four)
  • ‘‘Ray of Light’’, Brad R. Torgersen (Analog 12/11)

BEST SHORT STORY

  • ‘‘Movement’’, Nancy Fulda (Asimov’s 3/11)
  • ‘‘The Paper Menagerie’’, Ken Liu (F&SF 3-4/11)
  • ‘‘The Homecoming’’, Mike Resnick (Asimov’s 4-5/11)
  • ‘‘Shadow War of the Night Dragons, Book One: The Dead City (Prologue)’’, John Scalzi (Tor.com 4/1/11)
  • ‘‘The Cartographer Wasps and the Anarchist Bees’’, E. Lily Yu (Clarkesworld 4/11)

BEST RELATED WORK

BEST GRAPHIC STORY

BEST DRAMATIC PRESENTATION – LONG

BEST DRAMATIC PRESENTATION – SHORT

BEST PROFESSIONAL EDITOR LONG FORM

  • Lou Anders
  • Liz Gorinsky
  • Anne Lesley Groell
  • Patrick Nielsen Hayden
  • Betsy Wollheim

BEST PROFESSIONAL EDITOR SHORT FORM

  • John Joseph Adams
  • Neil Clarke
  • Stanley Schmidt
  • Jonathan Strahan
  • Sheila Williams

BEST PROFESSIONAL ARTIST 

  • Daniel Dos Santos
  • Bob Eggleton
  • Michael Komarck
  • Stephan Martiniere
  • John Picacio

BEST SEMIPROZINE

BEST FANZINE

BEST FANCAST

BEST FAN WRITER

  • James Bacon
  • Claire Brialey
  • Christopher J Garcia
  • Jim C. Hines
  • Steven H Silver

BEST FAN ARTIST

  • Brad W. Foster
  • Randall Munroe
  • Spring Schoenhuth
  • Maurine Starkey
  • Steve Stiles
  • Taral WayNe

JOHN W. CAMPBELL AWARD FOR BEST NEW WRITER [NOT A HUGO AWARD]

  • Mur Lafferty
  • Stina Leicht
  • *Karen Lord
  • *Brad R. Torgersen
  • E. Lily Yu

*Finalists in their 2nd year of eligibility.

There were 1,101 nominating ballots received from members of Chicon 7 and Renovation. The deadline for online ballots and the receipt of paper ballots is July 31, 2012 (midnight PDT).

Posted in Books and Literature, Fantasy, Science Fiction, Signal Boost | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Hunger Games: A Review & Essay

by Rebecca Longster

Teens of the Future on Survivor ~ for real

A review of The Hunger Games, directed by Gary Ross, starring Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, and Lenny Kravitz

Several years ago I had a story idea that went something like this: The protagonist was a young mother in a society that had (d)evolved into one in which, by law, couples were limited to a certain number of children ~ while birth control of any kind was illegal.

And if, in the world of this story, one did have too many children? Then one had a certain amount of time to surrender the “extra” children to the local “welfare” office, thereafter to be processed and sent to a “relocation” center ~ kind of like sending concentration camp prisoners to the “showers” in Nazi Germany.

I didn’t write it for two reasons. The first was that the idea was horrifying. It had come to me in a stress dream, and it was indicative of my state of mind at the time as a single parent trying to raise 4 children on little more than the faith of a mustard seed praying for loaves and fishes (and school clothes would have been nice, too).

The second reason I didn’t write the story was really paramount though ~ I could have overcome the first, if only to see where the story would take me. But I didn’t write it mainly because I didn’t think there would be a market for it (even if I had had the first clue where to look for a publisher).

Who would buy, in either sense, a story about a society in which human beings just like us would allow even one of their children to be taken ~ who would, indeed, obediently offer up their children to be killed ~ just because it was a law? The idea seemed ludicrous.

True, there are many stories and movies of dystopian societies that sacrifice, both figuratively and literally, their freedom and their citizenry for one reason or another. The Running Man? Sure. 1984? Right. Even “The Lottery.” No problem. Because, even in the last instance, the sheep to the slaughter are grown-ups, adults who at least have age and experience and the choice, no matter how austere the alternative, of whether or not to participate in that society and be governed by its laws.

Adults might be able to rationalize the routine sacrifice of one of their number, I reasoned, but no civilized people would submit to a government that would routinely kill their children ~ therefore, no market for such a story. (My husband says I always give people too much credit.)

Well, as one of S.E. Hinton’s characters so memorably said: That was then. This is now.

It’s not that big a leap ~

Apart from the first chapter of the first novel that I downloaded as a sample, I haven’t read The Hunger Games novel on which the movie is based. However, having seen the movie, I think Suzanne Collins, and I must be sisters under the skin. The main difference is, she’s a much younger sister, a sister of a whole other generation.

Collins grew up during an age in which such a scenario seemed more than plausible. She is of the generation raised on so-called reality TV ~ television shows, in prime time, that seemed designed to dismantle the system of values that we have long prided ourselves on teaching our children, values of honesty and fairness and compassion for one’s fellow humans.

I don’t know what the original idea was behind Survivor and Big Brother (and you know where that name came from, don’t you?) and others of their ilk, but what these weekly TV shows rapidly became was object lessons in the values of whoever-lies-and-cheats-the-best-lasts-the- longest.

These shows pitted people against each other, encouraged two or more to form alliances ~ and then made it impossible to “win” without betraying that trust and turning on each other. Each week, and with each “new” reality TV series, supposed adults reenacted, for the entertainment of the television audience, ever more cruel and debasing versions of Lord of the Flies.

Small wonder, then, that the premise of The Hunger Games became not only plausible but well received by young adult and adult audiences alike. It doesn’t hurt anything that the story, like most dystopian fiction, is set in the future and elsewhere, either. We can allow for and even enjoy the premise of a far distant society full of people who let the government take 24 of their teenaged sons and daughters every year and put them to death at each others hands ~ because, while such a thing could surely happen, nothing like that could happen here, in our society.

Katniss Everdeen shines ~

It occurs to me that the above makes it appear that I didn’t “like” The Hunger Games, when nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, the movie was so well done, the characters and storyline so compelling that, even though the movie was complete in and of itself, I won’t be satisfied, now, until I read the books.

Much about the movie is well done, including setting, costuming, and camera work, as well as the actors portrayals of characters, key and low key. Lenny Kravitz, for example, turns in a stunning portrayal of Cinna, making the most quiet, low key scene into an emotional gut punch by mere expression or muted gesture reminding us of why he’s staging these young people in the first place, while simultaneously providing a near perfect foil for Woody Harrelson’s Haymitch.

Equally effective, in a more chilling, where’s-the-exit-again? way is the incarnation of the aptly named Caesar Flickerman (Stanley Tucci), the over-the-top host of the televised Hunger Games. To say this guy has mad skills would be much too ironic, not to mention an understatement.

But what makes the movie a success, ultimately, is the heroine herself: Katniss Everdeen.

When you see the movie, you’ll find the camera work in the early scenes disorienting and disconcerting, but once the focus comes to rest on Katniss Everdeen, everything becomes steady, implying that in this reality nothing is certain or sure, no one steadfast, but Katniss herself ~ and that first impression is, itself, consistently demonstrated through out the movie, in Jennifer Lawrence’s portrayal of Katniss.

There’s a point, after they’ve been selected and taken to the Capitol, when Peeta, the male “tribute” from District 12, tells Katniss that, while he fully expects to die in the games, he wants “them” to know they don’t own him, that he doesn’t want to be changed by the experience into something or someone he’s not.

Katniss understands, but she just “can’t afford to think like that.”

Yet, from the moment she volunteers to take her little sister’s place as the female tribute in the Hunger Games through her clear relief that Gale (Liam Hemsworth) isn’t chosen as the male; through her unspoken but obvious decision to simply do her best to survive as long as possible, rather than joining forces with the likes of Cato (Alexander Ludwig) and his group to kill off the other tributes; to her final choice to cheat “them” of their winner ~ it is Katniss who, ultimately, remains true to herself.

It is her repeated refusal to compromise her personal set of values, even at the cost of her own life, that holds us all in thrall ~ and that thralldom, itself, shines with hope for the real life future that will be molded by our teens.

The popularity of Katniss Everdeen and The Hunger Games illustrates that somehow ~ in spite of the culture of “reality” TV and the shifting sands of uncertainty that have become the hallmark of some of our “advanced” societies and governments ~ there is still something within some of us (apparently a lot of us, to judge by the box office) that believes in and aspires to the ideal.

We, including our teens, are drawn to Katniss because she embodies that ideal ~ she is that person of honor and valor and indomitable spirit who may be maimed, broken, even killed, but who, having chosen the moral high ground, will not be moved.

That’s a shining beacon of hope if I ever saw one.

~

Rebecca Longster is a writer, an avid reader, and just generally addicted to words in a row. In addition to writing fiction and non-fiction, both for the web and for print publication, she currently teaches writing at Purdue University in West Lafayette, IN and lives “across the river” in Lafayette, with her husband, James (artist, photographer, and renaissance man) and two crazy kitties. You can get in touch with her at Rebecca@RenaissanceWomanInk.com or visit her website of the same name (currently under reconstruction).

Posted in Books and Literature, Reviews, Science Fiction, Uncategorized, Young Adult Literature | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Review: The Captains (2011), a film by William Shatner

Review by Rebecca Whitus Longster

The Captains: in the beginning ~ 

At the risk of showing my inner nerd, geek, dweeb or whatever it’s called these days, I’ve got to say how pleased and impressed I was, watching William Shatner’s “affable documentary,” (Netflix) The Captains (2011).

Yet, what I found most enlightening may not have been what he intended ~ and that is the apparently huge divide between his perception of himself and his contribution to the Star Trek universe ~ and ours.

I read on the NPR site last week about his one man show, and I wonder how much material used there came from the same place as the revealing, almost intimate, glimpse The Captains ends up giving us into Shatner himself, into the man whose portrayal of Captain James T. Kirk made such an indelible mark on the universe that grew up around the original Star Trek series.

In the documentary, Shatner interviews Sir Patrick Stewart (Jean-Luc Picard), Avery Brooks (Benjamin Sisko), Kate Mulgrew (Kathryn Janeway), and Scott Bakula (Jonathan Archer), all captains of their own ships, Enterprise and otherwise, in the Star Trek universe, along with Chris Pine, the most recent Captain of the Enterprise, by virtue of his incarnation as the young Jim Kirk.

Yet the connection between these captains, forged by their shared legacy of the big chair (and, I’ve got to say, one of my favorite throw away lines in the 2009 Star Trek movie is young acting-captain Spock’s dry drawl to young not-yet-captain Kirk: “out of the chair,” during a tactical planning session) is but a framework for a discussion that becomes much less about the characters they once played than about the people they are, the things they value, and how, at least in part, their lives and perceptions of themselves have been impacted by their shared heritage and yet uniquely individual experiences as Star Trek captains.

Essentially, “polling” his “peers” in this one common (yet so uncommon) experience, on matters beyond that shared experience, Shatner himself gains insights that change, or at least aid in the change of, his own perceptions ~ and in, I think, a very positive way.

“Unprecedented,” Patrick Stewart says of the phenomenon that is Star Trek, of the fact that so much grew out of William Shatner’s portrayal of Kirk and the relationships between him and his bridge crew.

“A magical kind of relationship,” Scott Bakula says of the relationship between characters inhabited by the members of the ensemble cast at the core the original Star Trek series’ success ~ but a seemingly unique magic, he continues, as no one else had been able to replicate it.

Yet Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Carl Urban, Anton Yelchin, John Cho, and Simon Pegg (and even Bruce Greenwood) manage to recreate it in J.J. Abrams’ 2009 tour de force.

Jim Kirk’s World: we wish we lived in it

I remember how nervous I was to see the 2009 Star Trek in the theater. I had gone into the theater, the film, and the universe itself, so afraid they were going to . . . well, screw it up.

And they so didn’t.

I wasn’t sold right from the start. Not by the utterly heart wrenching scene in which George Kirk chooses to sacrifice himself to ensure the crew’s escape, even as his son is being born in the escape shuttle. The circumstances of his birth, the scant few seconds George has with his wife over the com link to share the joy and decide what to call their baby boy, their love for each other a tangible thing standing out from and separate to the chaos of the moment, is so poignant that I’m clearing my eyes of tears so I don’t miss anything ~ even as part of me is saying “that never happened” in the “real” Trek universe.

And it didn’t, this isn’t the “real” Trek universe, and the cadets who become the crew of the Enterprise aren’t the real crew of the original series. And yet, somehow it is ~ and somehow they are.

The actors’ portrayals of these iconic characters ~ Kirk, Uhura, McCoy, Spock, Chekov, Sulu, Scotty, even Captain Pike ~ are so spot on, while at the same time so delightfully unique to the actors portraying them, that you are sold on their reality perhaps by those very divergences.

I literally wept at the end ~ not because it was sad, but because it did feel so real. I had entered in to the universe once more and, somehow, I had time traveled back to the beginning of the adventure, when the young crew had it all before them. So real were they to me that I envied them that adventure.

I felt so like the older Spock, who, looking down on the scene of the young Kirk’s newly minted captaincy, murmurs, with a kind of bittersweet longing: “thrusters on full.” I was sad that I, too, must remain behind, like the older Spock, a relic, out of time.

And still, in this alternate time line of a universe, the young Captain Kirk is the linchpin, the axis on which all of the action turns and around which all of the other characters orbit, defined by their interactions with and relationship to him and each other.

Picard and Kirk: the yin and yang coalesce

While the documentary cuts back and forth between Shatner’s interviews of the different Captains, on topics as far ranging as their beliefs about what happens to us after death, and contains brief remarks by other individual stars in the Star Trek firmament, like Johnathan Frakes and even Christopher Plummer, in truth, the unifying thread is largely a conversation between Shatner and Stewart, the two most iconographic Captains of all.

It always comes back to those two, Shatner and Stewart, the yin and yang of Enterprise captains, and their discussions seem underscored by a certain depth of affection and trust between them that I find most appealing and reassuring.

But most revealing, and surprising, is Shatner’s revelation, during a discussion with Stewart, that for the longest time he felt embarrassed by his association with Star Trek, felt that people derided and looked down on him because of it ~ even in the face of the thousands of fans that show up at conventions year after year, decades after the original series wrapped, and despite the standing ovations and roof raising cheers his appearance at these conventions always occasions. For all those years, he believed that every “beam me up, Scottie” was derisive, meant to belittle, and so it seemed he would never be at peace with what has become his most memorable role.

Like Patrick Stewart, William Shatner can look back on a depth and richness that is his body of work, multiple roles well acted and scenes well played, and yet his perception of Captain Kirk as an embarrassing interlude has long cast a shadow over all of that. As Julia Roberts says in Pretty Woman: the bad things are easier to believe.

And so, unbeknownst to the rest of us, and even when those “bad things” had no substance in reality, they have been easier to believe for William Shatner ~ until now. Finally, in what is a very revealing 90 minutes, we are allowed a glimpse of insecurities we never even suspected existed within the talent and presence of our Captain Kirk. Best of all, somehow that chink of uncertainty shines a bit more light on the absurdity of our own negative perceptions of our own work and the dangers inherent in projecting that negativity onto others’ reactions and observations.

Completely in keeping with our perceptions of William Shatner and James T. Kirk, however, we are only made privy to these insecurities now that he has come to terms with them. It’s also clear that Patrick Stewart is instrumental in that resolution and influential in Shatner’s perceptual shift.

Sir Patrick Stewart in talking with Shatner reflects upon the joy he took in his role as Captain of the Enterprise in TNG, illustrating that he brought to that role the same passion he brings to the exercise of his craft and to every role he plays.

In his openness and equally revealing observations, Stewart in some way illustrates to Shatner, by his own example, the value of what they each contributed. As they talk, one can almost see that perceptual shift taking place in Shatner’s eyes and expression.

The man who originally defined the role that made him, William Shatner, as iconic as the character he inhabited, seems at last at peace with, and perhaps even proud of, that role.

Perception is a tricky thing ~ our perception of ourselves, of reality, of truth ~ of how other people perceive us. Testing our perceptions against a more objective yardstick is trickier still, I think, and requires much more courage. To forge on in spite of ones fears and insecurities is the very definition of courage, and that quality is something both Jim Kirk and Bill Shatner have always had in abundance.

For the fans, The Captains is enjoyable just for the opportunity to see again some of our favorite people, and I hope to see William Shatner’s one man show (Shatner’s World, We Just Live In It) for the same reason.

The Captains may have originally been meant to give us some insight into the shared experience of being a Star Trek Captain, or perhaps it was meant to try to discover why the Star Trek Universe continues to be such a powerful draw for so many people (the as yet untitled sequel to J.J. Abrams’ 2009 Star Trek is filming even now).

Whatever the intent, and whatever else it may be, in the end, The Captains provides us with a unique insight into the power of one’s own perception ~ for good or ill ~ even for an icon like William Shatner.

~

Rebecca Longster is a writer, an avid reader, and just generally addicted to words in a row. In addition to writing fiction and non-fiction, both for the web and for print publication, she currently teaches writing at Purdue University in West Lafayette, IN and lives “across the river” in Lafayette, with her husband, James (artist, photographer, and renaissance man) and two crazy kitties. You can get in touch with her at Rebecca@RenaissanceWomanInk.com or visit her website of the same name (currently under reconstruction).

Posted in Movies, Reviews, Science Fiction, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment